- Who runs it
- Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada / Innovation, sciences et développement économique Canada
- Can it affect people?
- Mostly indirectly. It is described as a tool for staff and internal work.
- Possible rights impact: Internal operations
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Government of Canada AI Register / Government of Canada AI Register / 2025-01-01
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
An internal tool developed by Corporations Canada to assist with post-filing reviews of Individuals with Significant Control filings. It uses machine learning to flag potentially inappropriate, non-genuine, or offensive names for human review. The objective is to improve operational efficiency and accuracy in maintaining data integrity while ensuring compliance with legal requirements. The system does not make administrative decisions; all flagged cases are reviewed by staff.
If this affects someone
Increased efficiency and accuracy in screening Individuals with Significant Control filings, reduced manual review workload, and improved compliance with data integrity standards.
Internal Corporations Canada Individuals with Significant Control filings dataset, structured name fields.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Government of Canada AI Register on 2026-09-05. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada / Innovation, sciences et développement économique Canada
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 22 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported58 days agoPartialImported from Government of Canada AI Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.