- Who runs it
- Cour de cassation
- Can it affect people?
- Yes. It may support a decision about a person, such as access to a service, place, payment, or permit.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- ODAP public algorithms inventory / ODAP public algorithms inventory / 2024-01-23
- LABEL source code and review workflow / Cour de cassation
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
A natural-language system that pre-annotates identifying information in French court decisions before open-data publication.
the story
A court judgment can be publicly useful while still containing private details. LABEL helps reviewers find those details before the decision is released.
Human proofread LABEL is built around review of machine pre-annotations
Facts to check
- 01
The purpose is pseudonymisation of court decisions for open data.
- 02
Annotators can add, remove, or change the model's labels.
- 03
The open-source workflow supports assignment, double review, and quality checks.
If this affects someone
A missed identifier could expose personal information; excessive removal could make a judgment harder to understand.
Court annotators proofread and edit the algorithm's pre-annotations. The open-source interface includes documents requiring double review.
This is a publication workflow rather than a ruling system. Privacy or publication concerns can be raised with the responsible court service.
French judicial decisions, including national court databases used to train and apply named-entity recognition.
Sources and further reading
Based on ODAP public algorithms inventory. This page separates facts in the source from questions the source leaves open.
Plain-language text was checked against the linked sources. Older editorial records do not retain model or prompt logs, so this is explanation, never evidence.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Cour de cassation
- Life area
- Justice
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 12 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported2 months agoPartialImported from ODAP public algorithms inventory.
- Public register record12 months agoSubstantialAdded from ODAP public algorithms inventory.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.