- Who runs it
- Gemeente Amsterdam
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- MM Wave sensing pilot / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2025-09-10
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
Dit betreft wetenschappelijk onderzoek met AMS Institute en TU Delft. Het algoritme wordt gebruikt om signalen die binnenkomen in de mmWave sensor om te zetten in een getal dat het van het aantal mensen voor de sensor representeert. Dit is bedoeld om een privacy vriendelijker alternatief te hebben voor voetganger-telcameras in de stad. Er is een pilotsetting op het Marineterrein.
If this affects someone
N.v.t. Soortgelijke algoritmebeschrijvingen Gladheid meldsysteem Provincie Noord-Brabant Het algoritme gebruikt sensordata om een calculatie te maken voor voorspellingen van gladheidsrisico's. Deze voorspellingen worden gebruikt om te bepalen waar (preventief) gestrooid moet worden, in overleg met meteorologen. Daarnaast kan het algoritme verschillende alarmen geven, bijvoorbeeld bij kans op bevriezing van natte wegdelen. Laatst gewijzigd op 10 juli 2024 om 8:18 | Publicatiestandaard 1.0 Publicatiecategorie Over...
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-09-03. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Gemeente Amsterdam
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 12 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported14 days agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.