- Who runs it
- Gemeente Utrecht
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Geluidsmodel / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2025-09-05
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
If this affects someone
Het algoritme (met directe impact op Utrechtse bewoners en diens leefomgeving) dient slechts als een informatiebron voor een medewerker, die op basis daarvan en de bijbehorende context van de situatie de juiste vervolgstap neemt. Dit uitgangspunt is opgenomen in ons Utrechtse kader Interne richtlijnen toepassing Algoritmen.
geluidsnorm geluidsmetingen in Utrecht meldingen mbt geluidsoverlast gegevens mbt handhaving van geluidsoverlast Soortgelijke algoritmebeschrijvingen Luchtkwaliteitsmodel Gemeente Utrecht We willen graag borgen dat de luchtkwaliteitsnormen in Utrecht niet worden overtreden. Daarmee dragen we bij aan Gezond Stedelijk Leven in Utrecht. Laatst gewijzigd op 5 september 2025 om 12:53 | Publicatiestandaard 1.0 Publicatiecategorie Impactvolle algoritmes
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-09-03. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Gemeente Utrecht
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 13 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported14 days agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.