- Who runs it
- Gemeente Zeist
- Can it affect people?
- Mostly indirectly. It is described as a tool for staff and internal work.
- Possible rights impact: Internal operations
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Microsoft CoPilot / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2025-01-21
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
In dit testtraject wordt er gekeken of Microsoft CoPilot de medewerkers van de organisatie kan ondersteunen bij de dagelijkse werkzaamheden. Denk hierbij bijvoorbeeld aan het samenvatten van jaarverslaggen, het opstellen van brieven en het analyseren van gegevens.
If this affects someone
Antwoorden en aanpassingen van/door CoPilot worden altijd nagekeken door een medewerker. Er wordt geen enkel document naar vrijgegeven waar geen medewerker naar heeft gekeken.
Gegevens die medewerkers invoeren. Intern beleid geeft medewerkers handvatten voor goed gebruik van CoPilot. Zo is bij medewerkers bekend dat geen persoonsgegevens moeten worden gedeeld met CoPilot en dat de output altijd moet worden gecontroleerd.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-09-08. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Gemeente Zeist
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 22 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported55 days agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.