- Who runs it
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Can it affect people?
- We cannot tell yet. The public record does not make the possible effect clear.
- Possible rights impact: Not established
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- 2025 U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / 2026-04-13
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
ReCAP provides an architecture for lightweight, efficient coordination of highly-capable agents in a comms-limited environment. By providing agents with high-level, lightweight information about the capabilities of other agents in the fleet, ReCAP can facilitate allocation of tasks that are dynamically discovered and assigned via an auction. Auctions are conducted for particular tasks, and agents formulate bids based on encoded subject matter expertise predicting how a given action will affect their operations. For example, one agent may request that...
If this affects someone
agency-caio@mail.nasa.gov
Sources and further reading
First indexed from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory on 2026-09-03. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Life area
- Transport
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 5 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported14 days agoPartialImported from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.