- 谁在运行
- The Crown Prosecution Service
- 它会影响人们吗?
- 主要是间接影响。公开记录将其描述为工作人员和内部工作的工具。
- 可能的权利影响: 内部运作
我们了解多少?
来源是信息所依据的公开网页或文件。标记说明记录有多完整,不代表系统是否良好或安全。缺少信息不等于缺少保护措施。
来源与延伸阅读
- The Crown Prosecution Service: Beam Notes / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records / 2026-09-09
- GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records - official inventory / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records
可选详情完整记录与详情
界面和说明指南已经翻译。记录名称与描述、引文、详细编辑说明和链接的公共文件保留发布时的语言,避免悄然改变证据。
如果它影响到个人
of generating transcripts and summaries. Beam does not integrate Beam Notes with other CPS systems, and all data processing is carried out in compliance with data protection legislation. Access is restricted to authenticated CPS staff via Single Sign-On, and Beam Notes retains data only for a limited period (up to 30 days) before deletion. All Beam staff and sub-processors are subject to contractual and technical controls, including ISO27001 and CyberEssentials Plus certification, to ensure data security and app...
and verification process prior to use. Beam Notes uses commercial large language models for speech‑to‑text transcription and summarisation. CPS and Beam co‑designed templated structures that provide clear guardrails, ensuring that summaries align with CPS requirements. These models are used exclusively for transcription and summarisation; no automated decision‑making is performed, and data is not retained or used...
The tool will not be used for decision making. Existing CPS policies and procedures for feedback, appeals and complaints continue to apply.
Beam does not train or develop its own AI models. All models used in the CPS deployment are pre-trained by their respective providers (Deepgram, OpenAI). No CPS data is used for model development. Beam pays for enterprise access to these models, which contractually guarantees that no inputs or outputs are used for training or product development by the model providers.
来源与延伸阅读
来源是支撑某项说法的公共文件。请直接打开,核实其内容和发布者。
确定性代码从链接的公开记录映射字段,没有生成式模型撰写此文本。
待核事实
- 谁在运行
- The Crown Prosecution Service
- 生活领域
- 公共部门
- 证据级别
- 来源支持
- 注释
- 2
- 更新于
- 7天前
分数安排工作,不评价人。
涉及权利的敏感用途、缺少来源、未回答的问责问题和陈旧证据会提高审查优先级;有力的官方文件会降低它。该分数不是对安全、公平或合法性的裁决。
空白字段表示所附公共来源没有给出答案。覆盖范围并不均衡,公开文件不能证明实际表现,证书也有明确适用边界。
当前方法未发现重大文档缺口。
以前的版本
- Imported3天前全面Imported from GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records.
帮助核查这条记录。
添加公共来源、质疑某项说法,或指出缺少联系人工的途径。
提交的姓名、邮箱、说明、来源或更正仅用于核实记录和防止滥用,不会自动公开。