- 谁在运行
- Network Rail
- 它会影响人们吗?
- 主要是间接影响。公开记录将其描述为工作人员和内部工作的工具。
- 可能的权利影响: 内部运作
我们了解多少?
来源是信息所依据的公开网页或文件。标记说明记录有多完整,不代表系统是否良好或安全。缺少信息不等于缺少保护措施。
来源与延伸阅读
- Network Rail: Digital Assistant / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records / 2024-12-17
- GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records - official inventory / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records
可选详情完整记录与详情
界面和说明指南已经翻译。记录名称与描述、引文、详细编辑说明和链接的公共文件保留发布时的语言,避免悄然改变证据。
如果它影响到个人
The live chat service used by customers to contact Network Rail was receiving a high number of queries that were a) not the responsibility of Network Rail and needed to be re-directed or b) the responsibility of Network Rail but where the information already existed online e.g. careers queries. The digital assistant was brought in to help customers get the answers to their queries quicker and give Network Rail live chat agents more time to deal with more complex queries.
Where the digital assistant provides an unsatisfactory answer to the customer (e.g. incorrectly recognises their intent) they are able to provide feedback such as "that did not help" and the digital assistant will immediately attempt to hand over to a contact centre agent in this scenario.
No formal data set used. Target intents, and example ways in which these questions were asked, were collected from Network Rail's incident history, and this was compiled into training data. Example phrases that indicate an intent - e.g. "I want to buy train tickets", "Am I allowed to take photos in the station?", "Do you have any job vacancies?"
来源与延伸阅读
来源是支撑某项说法的公共文件。请直接打开,核实其内容和发布者。
确定性代码从链接的公开记录映射字段,没有生成式模型撰写此文本。
待核事实
- 谁在运行
- Network Rail
- 生活领域
- 公共部门
- 证据级别
- 来源支持
- 注释
- 2
- 更新于
- 21个月前
分数安排工作,不评价人。
涉及权利的敏感用途、缺少来源、未回答的问责问题和陈旧证据会提高审查优先级;有力的官方文件会降低它。该分数不是对安全、公平或合法性的裁决。
空白字段表示所附公共来源没有给出答案。覆盖范围并不均衡,公开文件不能证明实际表现,证书也有明确适用边界。
以前的版本
- Imported14天前较充分Imported from GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records.
帮助核查这条记录。
添加公共来源、质疑某项说法,或指出缺少联系人工的途径。
提交的姓名、邮箱、说明、来源或更正仅用于核实记录和防止滥用,不会自动公开。