- 谁在运行
- NICE
- 它会影响人们吗?
- 主要是间接影响。公开记录将其描述为工作人员和内部工作的工具。
- 可能的权利影响: 内部运作
我们了解多少?
来源是信息所依据的公开网页或文件。标记说明记录有多完整,不代表系统是否良好或安全。缺少信息不等于缺少保护措施。
来源与延伸阅读
- NICE: Priority Screening Algorithm / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records / 2025-02-27
- GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records - official inventory / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records
可选详情完整记录与详情
界面和说明指南已经翻译。记录名称与描述、引文、详细编辑说明和链接的公共文件保留发布时的语言,避免悄然改变证据。
如果它影响到个人
This tool's purpose is to prioritise the scientific papers that could possibley include the content that users are looking for during the screening phase of systematic review. The model is actively trained based on the manual screening decisions of the systematic reviewer. It 'learns' to apply a label and then labels 'unseen' records. With this information it then ranks (and re-ranks) records that are being screened in systematic reviews. Applying this model on the 'unseen'/unreviewed scientific papers, has the...
The decision made by the tool does not directly affect the public. It's used to improve the efficiency of our processes. All approaches to screening are accompanied by a 10% Quality Assurance check which involves another reviewer blind screening 10% of the studies and then a comparison is made of the screening decisions. Any discrepancies are disucssed to agree whether the study should be included or excluded with...
Title and Abstract of scientific publications are the 'predictors', and the screening decisions made by the reviewer is the 'target' variables for logistic regression algorithm.
来源与延伸阅读
来源是支撑某项说法的公共文件。请直接打开,核实其内容和发布者。
确定性代码从链接的公开记录映射字段,没有生成式模型撰写此文本。
待核事实
- 谁在运行
- NICE
- 生活领域
- 公共部门
- 证据级别
- 来源支持
- 注释
- 2
- 更新于
- 19个月前
分数安排工作,不评价人。
涉及权利的敏感用途、缺少来源、未回答的问责问题和陈旧证据会提高审查优先级;有力的官方文件会降低它。该分数不是对安全、公平或合法性的裁决。
空白字段表示所附公共来源没有给出答案。覆盖范围并不均衡,公开文件不能证明实际表现,证书也有明确适用边界。
以前的版本
- Imported15天前较充分Imported from GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records.
帮助核查这条记录。
添加公共来源、质疑某项说法,或指出缺少联系人工的途径。
提交的姓名、邮箱、说明、来源或更正仅用于核实记录和防止滥用,不会自动公开。