- 谁在运行
- DWP
- 它会影响人们吗?
- 有可能。它可能影响人们看到、获推荐、被标记或被优先处理的内容。
- 可能的权利影响: 间接公共影响
我们了解多少?
来源是信息所依据的公开网页或文件。标记说明记录有多完整,不代表系统是否良好或安全。缺少信息不等于缺少保护措施。
来源与延伸阅读
- DWP: Whitemail Insights and Vulnerability Scanner / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records / 2025-11-27
- GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records - official inventory / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records
可选详情完整记录与详情
界面和说明指南已经翻译。记录名称与描述、引文、详细编辑说明和链接的公共文件保留发布时的语言,避免悄然改变证据。
它做什么
A service that reads circa 25,000 scanned documents/letters received from citizens per day and flags people who may need urgent assistance as a result of a vulnerability; it also builds Management Information(MI) trends over time against a set of themes.
如果它影响到个人
s: Vulnerability Scanner: This AI tool has been trained using Large Language Model (LLM). It analyses the content and context of "Whitemail" (physical post/mail for which we have no automatic handling rules - loosely everything that is not a DWP-issued form) to identify a potentially vulnerable customer. The solution also provides the rationale for identifying a vulnerable customer using DWP's prescribed themes, for example mental health, suicide, etc. Whitemail Insights: This AI tool classifies Whitemail into c...
Procedurely speaking, DWP staff handling the claim or engaging with a potentially vulnerable customer are expected to assess each document and the situation on a case-by-case basis. The department's numerous Benefit Lines follow overarching and claim-specific standards to provide effective service to their customers and these standards are not influenced by inputs from the two tools.
Both solutions were trained and tested using synthetic data developed using baseline data from the Document Repository System (DRS - holds records of mail received from citizens and compliant with Data Retention policies). Use of synthetic data was considered necessary to assess the solutions' performance at scale. The baseline data extracted from DRS was redacted (removal of PII/protected characteristics) prior to generating synthetic data from it.
来源与延伸阅读
来源是支撑某项说法的公共文件。请直接打开,核实其内容和发布者。
确定性代码从链接的公开记录映射字段,没有生成式模型撰写此文本。
待核事实
- 谁在运行
- DWP
- 生活领域
- 公共部门
- 证据级别
- 来源支持
- 注释
- 2
- 更新于
- 10个月前
分数安排工作,不评价人。
涉及权利的敏感用途、缺少来源、未回答的问责问题和陈旧证据会提高审查优先级;有力的官方文件会降低它。该分数不是对安全、公平或合法性的裁决。
空白字段表示所附公共来源没有给出答案。覆盖范围并不均衡,公开文件不能证明实际表现,证书也有明确适用边界。
以前的版本
- Imported15天前较充分Imported from GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records.
帮助核查这条记录。
添加公共来源、质疑某项说法,或指出缺少联系人工的途径。
提交的姓名、邮箱、说明、来源或更正仅用于核实记录和防止滥用,不会自动公开。