- 谁在运行
- Leeds City Council
- 它会影响人们吗?
- 主要是间接影响。公开记录将其描述为工作人员和内部工作的工具。
- 可能的权利影响: 内部运作
我们了解多少?
来源是信息所依据的公开网页或文件。标记说明记录有多完整,不代表系统是否良好或安全。缺少信息不等于缺少保护措施。
来源与延伸阅读
- Leeds City Council: Xylo Core / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records / 2025-11-27
- GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records - official inventory / GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records
可选详情完整记录与详情
界面和说明指南已经翻译。记录名称与描述、引文、详细编辑说明和链接的公共文件保留发布时的语言,避免悄然改变证据。
如果它影响到个人
or not scalable enough. Rule-based automation was explored but could not handle the complexity of planning documents. Rules engines also cannot easily handle diverse document types (including images), free-text or different report styles and formats. The chosen LLM-based workspace offers significant productivity gains with adaptable prompts accompanied by a comprehensive suite of bias evaluations and regression tests and human-in-the-loop editing.
Validation and planning officers retain full control over all decisions. They must review every suggestion, verify its relevance, and edit any draft text. Officers can ignore or override any recommendation. Sources and reasoning are provided with every recommendation and an audit log tracks all activity allowing any officer and/or auditor to trace exactly what information Xylo supplied and what the officer kept.
Standard planning appeal procedures are unchanged. As the tool does not make decisions, all officer determinations remain subject to normal review through planning committees and the Planning Inspectorate. The planning officer is always in control and responsible for making all decisions. If there is a freedom of information request or a judicial review about any decision, the tool can provide a full audit trail o...
National and local planning policy documents - https://www.leeds.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy
来源与延伸阅读
来源是支撑某项说法的公共文件。请直接打开,核实其内容和发布者。
确定性代码从链接的公开记录映射字段,没有生成式模型撰写此文本。
待核事实
- 谁在运行
- Leeds City Council
- 生活领域
- 公共部门
- 证据级别
- 来源支持
- 注释
- 2
- 更新于
- 10个月前
分数安排工作,不评价人。
涉及权利的敏感用途、缺少来源、未回答的问责问题和陈旧证据会提高审查优先级;有力的官方文件会降低它。该分数不是对安全、公平或合法性的裁决。
空白字段表示所附公共来源没有给出答案。覆盖范围并不均衡,公开文件不能证明实际表现,证书也有明确适用边界。
当前方法未发现重大文档缺口。
以前的版本
- Imported15天前全面Imported from GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Records.
帮助核查这条记录。
添加公共来源、质疑某项说法,或指出缺少联系人工的途径。
提交的姓名、邮箱、说明、来源或更正仅用于核实记录和防止滥用,不会自动公开。