- Who runs it
- Canada Revenue Agency
- Can it affect people?
- Yes. It may support a decision about a person, such as access to a service, place, payment, or permit.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- CRA Portal Fraud Anomaly Detection - public register entry / Government of Canada AI Register / 28 April 2026
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
AI and machine-learning analysis of secure-portal access logs to find suspicious or potentially fraudulent transactions.
the story
One suspicious portal action can disappear inside billions of ordinary records. Anomaly detection narrows the search, but unusual behaviour is not automatically fraud.
Billions historical access-log records described in the Canadian register
Facts to check
- 01
The use case concerns activity inside secure Canada Revenue Agency portals.
- 02
The register names digital fingerprint data as an input.
- 03
The row does not state what happens to a user after an anomaly is found.
If this affects someone
A flag could trigger additional security or fraud review of a taxpayer's account activity.
The public register row does not clearly describe human confirmation, false-positive testing, or retention rules.
The entry does not identify a model-specific appeal or account-recovery route.
Secure-portal access logs and digital fingerprint data.
Sources and further reading
Based on Government of Canada AI Register. This page separates facts in the source from questions the source leaves open.
Plain-language text was checked against the linked sources. Older editorial records do not retain model or prompt logs, so this is explanation, never evidence.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Canada Revenue Agency
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 6 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported2 months agoPartialImported from Government of Canada AI Register.
- Public register record6 months agoPartialAdded from Government of Canada AI Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.