- Who runs it
- Environment and Climate Change Canada / Environnement et Changement climatique Canada
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Government of Canada AI Register / Government of Canada AI Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
Environment and Climate Change Canada's Digital Services Branch (ECCC-DSB) built custom course creation tools grounded in training material. Proof of Concept project to explore how generative AI could be used to create training material.
If this affects someone
Proof of Concept only, was retired after client exploration. The system was able to read the content of multiple source documents and create an outiline of a training program based on the source material. It also had tha ability to generate testing tools.
Generative AI Model knowledge augmented by source documents in a Retrieval Augmented Generation tool.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Government of Canada AI Register on 2026-09-03. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Environment and Climate Change Canada / Environnement et Changement climatique Canada
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 2 days ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported14 days agoPartialImported from Government of Canada AI Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.