- Who runs it
- Direcció General de Polítiques Ambientals i Medi Natural
- Can it affect people?
- Yes. It may support a decision about a person, such as access to a service, place, payment, or permit.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Government of Catalonia AI and Algorithm Register / Government of Catalonia AI and Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
Sistema basat en intel·ligència artificial generativa per facilitar l'eficiència en la redacció d'informes tècnics per l'autorització d'activitats que poden afectar el medi natural, com ara curses de muntanya, aprofitaments forestals o permisos de vol de drons.
If this affects someone
Empleats públics de la Direcció General de Polítiques Ambientals i Medi Natural
El resultat és automatitzat, però una persona n'ha fet una validació final.
Les dades que utilitza l'eina són: | 1. Informes anteriors de la mateixa casuística. | 2- Capes Shapefile de les figures de protecció i dels elements de conservació afectats. | 3. Fitxers de càlcul amb les condicions a tenir en compte per les autoritzacions.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Government of Catalonia AI and Algorithm Register on 2026-09-03. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Direcció General de Polítiques Ambientals i Medi Natural
- Life area
- Environment
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 2 days ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported13 days agoSubstantialImported from Government of Catalonia AI and Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.