- Who runs it
- Gemeente Amstelveen
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Anonimiseren / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2026-10-21
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
If this affects someone
Het algoritme doet uitsluitend suggesties aan de medewerker. De uitkomst van het algoritme wordt gecontroleerd door een medewerker. De medewerker wordt door de software verplicht om alle pagina's te controleren. De medewerker bepaalt of het document correct is geanonimiseerd.
Alle informatie die te vinden is in de geüploade documenten (behalve de metadata), wordt verwerkt door het algoritme. Het kan daarbij gaan om gewone persoonsgegevens, bijzondere persoonsgegevens en strafrechtelijke gegevens. Het kan ook gaan om bedrijfsgevoelige informatie. Technische werking Documenten worden door een medewerker geüpload naar de applicatie. Op dat moment wordt een kopie gemaakt van het origineel in de vorm van een PDF met tekstlaag en wordt de metadata van het oorspronkelijke document uit de ko...
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-10-05. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Gemeente Amstelveen
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 12 days ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported28 days agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.