- Who runs it
- Gemeente Rotterdam
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Selectie voor scanbussen / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2024-07-18
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
Opsporen van voertuigen van belastingschuldigen middels scanbus met kentekenplaatherkenning. Na toetsing door de belastingdeurwaarder wordt overgegaan tot beslag op het voertuig middels een wielkem en inschrijven in het RDW register. Deze melding in het RDW zorgt ervoor dat er administratief beslag ligt op het voertuig. Een zogenaamde tenaamstellingsblokkade, waardoor het voertuig niet overgeschreven kan worden op een andere eigenaar.
If this affects someone
De belastingdeurwaarder voert zelf altijd eerst een controle uit (in RDW en andere systemen) of beslaglegging geoorloofd is. Beslaglegging op roerende zaken door de belastingdeurwaarder kan pas nadat de invorderingsstrategie is gevolgd.
RDW, ANPR, Belastingssysteem,
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-11-02. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Gemeente Rotterdam
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 2 years ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported14 hours agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.