- Who runs it
- Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Modelsysteem voor de Klimaatscenario's voor Nederland / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2025-10-01
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
Het systeem is bedoeld om meer begrip te krijgen over het klimaat en de klimaatverandering in Nederland en de BES eilanden. En het systeem is bedoeld om de maatschappij te informeren over klimaatverandering en te waarschuwen voor de gevolgen.
If this affects someone
De klimaatwetenschappers bepalen de inputcondities en parameters waarmee de berekeningen worden uitgevoerd door het systeem en stellen daarna de nationale klimaatscenario's op.
Het KNMI maakt gebruik van data uit tijdreeksen van het KNMI, van andere landen, en van Europese organisaties en de WMO.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-10-26. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 13 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported8 days agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.