- Who runs it
- Provincie Groningen
- Can it affect people?
- Possibly. It may shape what people see, are recommended, flagged, or prioritised for.
- Possible rights impact: Indirect public effect
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Inspectie wegen - Kiwa KOAC / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2025-02-05
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - official inventory / Netherlands Algorithm Register
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
Het doel van dit algoritme is het efficienter maken van het onderhoud van de provinciale wegen. Door het toepassen van dit algoritme kan de status van de wegen beter gemonitord worden dan door middel van visuele inspectie. Tevens wordt het verloop van schade beter in kaart gebracht waardoor voorspellend onderhoud mogelijk gaat worden. Dit zal resulteren in goed onderhouden wegen en minder storende inspecties.
If this affects someone
De output van dit algoritme wordt geïnterpreteerd door de beheerder, deze vraagt een inspecteur om de schadebeelden te verifiëren. Pas nadat dit gedaan is wordt er een keuze gemaakt over de vervolgstappen met betrekking tot daadwerkelijk onderhoud.
De gegevens die gebruikt worden door het algoritme zijn de gemaakte scans. Deze scans worden door het algoritme vergeleken met (test)data van Rijkswaterstaat.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from Netherlands Algorithm Register on 2026-09-28. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Provincie Groningen
- Life area
- Public sector
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 21 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported35 days agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.