- Who runs it
- Municipality of Rucphen
- Who is affected
- Visitors proving their identity at a municipal desk.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Gezichtsvergelijking - hulpmiddel voor identiteitsvaststelling bij gemeentelijke balie / Netherlands Algorithm Register / 2026-08-14
- Netherlands Algorithm Register - browse the register / Netherlands Algorithm Register
How this summary was written
AI-assisted summary; not human-reviewed.
Codex. Exact model identifier unavailable. .
Only the linked source's purpose and affected groups are summarised. No invented examples or promises about results.
Face Comparison at the Municipal Deskoptional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
A face-comparison tool that helps a desk employee compare a live image with the photograph on an identity document to detect look-alike fraud.
the story
At a municipal counter, the tool compares two images and gives the clerk a signal. A doubtful match triggers a second pair of human eyes.
Facts to check
- 01
The employee makes the judgement and asks a colleague when in doubt.
- 02
Comparison runs locally and the register says biometric data is not stored.
- 03
The municipality reports completing a data-protection impact assessment.
If this affects someone
The judgement affects whether a person is accepted as the holder of an identity document. Errors may affect access to municipal services.
The desk employee reviews the result. In cases of doubt, a colleague is consulted under a four-eyes principle.
The public record gives municipal contact details but does not describe a tool-specific objection procedure.
A live image of the visitor and the identity-document photograph. Processing is described as local and temporary.
Sources and further reading
Based on an individual entry in the Netherlands Algorithm Register. Unknowns are stated plainly instead of being filled with guesses.
Plain-language text was checked against the linked sources. Older editorial records do not retain model or prompt logs, so this is explanation, never evidence.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Municipality of Rucphen
- Life area
- Digital identity
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 2
- updated
- 3 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported2 months agoPartialImported from Netherlands Algorithm Register.
- Public register record3 months agoPartialAdded from the Netherlands Algorithm Register.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.