- Who runs it
- Arbetsförmedlingen
- Who is affected
- Jobseekers being considered for Rusta och matcha.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Rusta och matcha - how the assessment works / Arbetsförmedlingen
How this summary was written
AI-assisted summary; not human-reviewed.
Codex. Exact model identifier unavailable. .
Only the linked source's purpose and affected groups are summarised. No invented examples or promises about results.
Rusta och matcha - statistiskt bedömningsstödoptional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
A statistical model recommends whether a jobseeker should receive Rusta och matcha and what level of support they may need. An employment officer makes the final assessment.
the story
If this affects someone
Jobseekers considered for Rusta och matcha and the support they receive.
The employment officer combines the recommendation with other information. The authority describes randomisation around some recommendation boundaries for evaluation.
The authority lists education, age, time registered, work experience, municipality and other personal data used in profiling.
Sources and further reading
A source is the public document behind a claim. Open it directly to check what it says and who published it.
A model helped draft this text. Model, prompt policy, sources, date, and human reviewer must be named in the record.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Arbetsförmedlingen
- Life area
- Employment
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 56 days ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.