- Who runs it
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Can it affect people?
- Yes. It may support a decision about a person, such as access to a service, place, payment, or permit.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- 2025 U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / 2026-04-13
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
This AI solution impacts the process of investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. These foodborne outbreaks require cooperative efforts from CDC staff, FDA, USDA, and local agencies and the AI system is used through a centralized data platform System for Enteric Disease Response, Investigation, and Coordination (also known as SEDRIC). For more information on SEDRIC, please go to our website: https://www.cdc.gov/foodborne-outbreaks/php/foodsafety/tools/index.html
If this affects someone
Data are used in outbreak/response scenarios, such as foodborne illness outbreak response. Data used is dependent on the situation and outbreak, and may be owned by CDC, FDA, USDA, State Health Departments, Tribal Health Departments, Local Health Departments, Territorial Health Departments, or other entities.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory on 2026-09-02. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Life area
- Healthcare
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 7 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported60 days agoPartialImported from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.