- Who runs it
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Can it affect people?
- Yes. It may support a decision about a person, such as access to a service, place, payment, or permit.
- Possible rights impact: Direct decision or access
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- Forced Labor Virtual Consultant - public register entry / 2025 U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / 13 April 2026
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
An analyst tool that combines internal forced-labour databases with preloaded trend information for risk research and reports.
the story
An analyst investigating a supply chain can bring scattered forced-labour information together before deciding what evidence needs deeper investigation.
Analyst support the federal inventory describes faster research, not an autonomous enforcement decision
Facts to check
- 01
The system integrates internal databases with trend-analysis data.
- 02
It supports risk identification and report generation.
- 03
The inventory classifies the use case as not high-impact.
If this affects someone
Its output may shape analyst attention in forced-labour enforcement work.
The inventory describes the system as support for analysts but does not clearly publish a report-review protocol or model accuracy measures.
The inventory does not identify a model-specific challenge route for an organisation affected by later enforcement work.
Internal forced-labour databases and preloaded trend-analysis information.
Sources and further reading
Based on 2025 U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory. This page separates facts in the source from questions the source leaves open.
Plain-language text was checked against the linked sources. Older editorial records do not retain model or prompt logs, so this is explanation, never evidence.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Life area
- Regulation
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 7 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported2 months agoPartialImported from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory.
- Public register record7 months agoPartialAdded from 2025 U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.