- Who runs it
- Department of Labor
- Can it affect people?
- Mostly indirectly. It is described as a tool for staff and internal work.
- Possible rights impact: Internal operations
How much do we know?
A source is a published page or document behind a claim. The label measures what is documented, not whether a system is good or safe. Missing information does not prove that a safeguard is missing.
Sources and further reading
- 2025 U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory / 2026-04-13
optional detailFull record and details
The interface and explanatory guides are translated. Record names, record descriptions, quotations, detailed editorial notes, and linked public documents stay in their published language so evidence is not silently changed.
What it does
The AI is intended to allow the claims examiner more time to focus on more critical adjudication tasks. The CM-929 and CM-908 forms amount to tens of thousands of incoming correspondence on an annual basis. Claims examiners were cumulatively spending an excess amount of time each year reviewing the forms only for indications of a change in circumstances (based on a check-the-box indicator) or similar notice. This would then be followed by the entry of a code signifying receipt in the Automated Support Package. Only a very small number of forms receive...
If this affects someone
Agency Generated using hundreds of example forms with dummy data and audited for accuracy.
Sources and further reading
First indexed from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory on 2026-10-26. Only usable fields from the public record are shown; missing answers remain blank.
Fields were mapped from the linked public record by deterministic code. No generative model wrote this text.
Facts to check
- Who runs it
- Department of Labor
- Life area
- Healthcare
- Proof level
- Source-backed
- Footnotes
- 1
- updated
- 7 months ago
The score orders work, not people.
Review priority rises for rights-sensitive uses, missing sources, unanswered accountability fields, and old evidence. Strong official documentation lowers it. The score is not a verdict on safety, fairness, or legality.
A missing field means the attached public sources did not answer it. Coverage is uneven, publication does not prove performance, and a certificate has a defined boundary.
Previous versions
- Imported7 days agoPartialImported from U.S. Federal Agency AI Use Case Inventory.
Help check this record.
Add a public source, challenge a claim, or point out a missing way to reach a person.
A submitted name, email, description, source, or correction is used only to verify the record and prevent abuse. It is not published automatically.